【陳壁生】經史之間一包養心得的鄭玄

作者:

requestId:684c3e145f15d5.33208151.

Zheng Xuan in History

Author: Chen Bisheng

Source: Author Author Authorized Confucian Network, Original Philosophy Research, 2020 Issue 1

Time: Confucius was in the 2570s and the first day of the third month of the Gengzi

                                                                                                                                                                                                                At the end of Han, the spread and excitement of classics such as “Zhou Guan” and “Zuo Ji”, and Zheng Xuan introduced the classics of ancient literature into the academic system. Zheng Xuan’s goal of notes is to “study the original meaning of the ancestors”. Its basic landscape is the system that understands the “King Guanxue” in “Hanshu·Artist Book” now. It is not difficult to describe studying as a king’s official school, and it is history. In Zheng Xuan’s system, books are gatherings of literature from Mi Xi to Confucius, and history is just a way to understand books, and books that are independent as literature. The independence and historicization of the book’s interpretation not only relies on the independent position of the department, but also shapes the traditional historical tradition.

 

Keywords: Zheng Xuan, Historical

 

One of the focus characteristics of Chinese civilization is its historical tradition. Specifically in thinking and research, what is the relationship between history and history is absolutely reckless. The late Qing Dynasty’s historical relations are all recommended to the extreme. Liao Ping said in Xijing’s current literary studies that the Six Books were all empty words of Confucius as the legislative king of the Later Kings. His “Respecting Confucius” says: “If it is ancient history, the dog is a dog and a dog lacks self-existence.” He believed that history is contrary to history, history is a thing that has been done, and it is a writing of empty words. Therefore, he wrote a book called “The Micro of Confucius’ Philosophy”, which said: “The Philosophy’s Novels are very opposite to historical literature. However, Confucius’ empty words and teachings, waiting for the saints to know the heavens, and he has completely thought and accomplished nothing, so he defeated this term. … The book is called “Confucius Philosophy”, which shows that it is not historical law.” As Bao QingWhat he said is that the reason why the world is in the past is the opposite of history. Zhang Taiyan talked about the tradition of “Han Shu·Article and Wen Zhi” to Zhang Xueqing, and believed that the Six Books are all history. In his speech “The Great Idea of ​​the Book”, Zhang said: “The Six Books are all ancient history. Therefore, Liu Xin of the Han Dynasty wrote “Seven Notes”, and all the history of the records entered the “Years” family. It can be seen that there is no history outside, but it is the history of the predecessors, and history is the history of later generations. His “National Ancient of the People: Ming Jiegu” says: “The Six Books are all the ways of history. “But in fact, both of these are the arguments of the late Qing Dynasty’s academic reaction and purified academic studies. As Liao Zi said, it was difficult to study under Wei and Han, if Zhang’s discussion, there was no department in the Chinese classics. Going back to the interior of modern Chinese academic studies, between these two real knowledge, the history of Zheng Xuan The relationship is different from both of them. Moreover, to a certain level, it is Zheng Xuan’s historical view that has entered the history of Chinese civilization and participated in the construction of Chinese civilization.

 

01, Modern textStudy: The six arts “eclectic” is based on the MasterThe love affair

 

Zheng Xuan’s understanding of academic studies is the study of the fourteenth doctoral students in the Han Dynasty. Therefore, in this scene, Song Weitong held his feet, hesitated for half a minute, put down his suitcase, and followed the sound to find Zheng Xuan.

 

Sima wrote “The Family of Confucius”, which describes the Master’s holy scriptures and the six arts, and after he produced the Six Arts, he was moved by the Master’s “the most holy scriptures” and said: “Since the emperor’s honor, China’s saying that the Six Arts are compromising with the Master, can be said to be the most holy scriptures.” In Sima’s eyes, the Master’s holy scriptures were the six arts that the emperor gave to him.” “Transformation” means “Transformation”. “Shi Ji Suoxin” quotes Wang Shushu: “Transformation is correct.” He also quotes Song Jun: “Transformation is interruption. Zhong, it is correct.” If Confucius only cleaned up the six kings that were passed down by the previous kings, and the five emperors and three kings each had their own differences in legislation, then, if we describe the six kings and the old ways of the previous kings, we cannot talk about “Transformation”. The reason why the Master was able to compromise on the six tales was that although the laws of the previous kings were different, after Confucius cut them down, the laws of the different sage kings were reflected and supplemented with each other, forming a common set of laws.

 

“If Chinese people talk about the six tales and express their gratitude to the Master, they can be said to be the most holy.” According to the two studies of the fourteen doctors in the current text, there are several aspects of their basic thinking conditions. First, in terms of legislation of sages, although there was a long history of civilization before Confucius, especially Zhou Wen was the most prosperous, Confucius combined the previous sages and became the “most sage”. The “most sage” of “most sages” was for the legislative sages such as Ji, Shun, Yu, Tang, Wen, and Wu before Confucius. “The Doctrine of the Mean” says Confucius, “The ancestors talked about Wu Shun and praised Wu Wu,” (“Legendary: Doctrine of the Mean”) and said that Confucius “has been far away from Wu Shun”, and said that Confucius said, “It is beyond the limit of the world, and no king who has been around for a hundred generations can be defeated. Since his life, there has never been a master.” You may say that Confucius: “Since his life, there has never been a prosperous person.” (“Mencius: Gong Shun”) Therefore, Confucius was able to combine the previous sages and establish a king.

 

The second is that in terms of law, there is a two-level difference in the sixth arts of the Master. The first level is the data itself of the sixth arts, not the product “made” by the Master, but the fortune of the modern sage king. For example, in ancient times, there were more than 3,000 poems, all of which were the laws of the previous kings. Confucius took it, “The superiors picked up the Qi Houji, and the middles described the prosperity of the Yin and Zhou dynasties, and the weakness of the Youkuan”. Confucius’ “Shifu” included the affairs of Qi, Houji, Yin and Zhou. Since the affairs of the previous kings existed, Confucius’ methods were also included. This is what Confucius said in “Shifu” to compromise. For example, in ancient times, emperors gave up their lives and many deaths survived. Confucius compiled the Book of Books, “The Preface of Books,” which was based on the Tang and Yu, and the Qin Dynasty, and the following events.” Confucius’s “Book” includes the affairs of Tang, Yu and Qin. As the affairs of the previous kings exist, Confucius’ methods are also included. This is what Confucius’ “Book” is to compromise. As for “Travel”, “The Family of Confucius” says Confucius “chasing the gifts of the three generations.” And the Book of Changes is even more “The three saints of man are more and more, and the world is full of three ancients.”. Even the “Year” written by Confucius, the information they have written, such as “Ganjing Fu”, “Kaoyizi”, and “Speaking Topics”: “In the past, Confucius was ordered by Duanmen to make the meaning of “Year”, and asked Zixia and fourteen other people to seek the historical notes of Zhou and obtained 120 national treasures.” In the “Year” produced by Confucius, the matter was written by Qi Huan and the history of his writings, but Confucius praised the title of “Year” and the law of a king was included in it. Therefore, the first meaning of the Five Sects was the method of the sage king before Confucius. If the fourteen doctoral statements were eliminated and the words were purely written, the previous script could be examined. If we look at the ancient historical gaze, the method of the sage king before Confucius was the history before Confucius. However, the meaning of the five fields is not naturally presented by the data itself, but by the value of thinking in it. Just as the meaning of flint is different from the stone, it is used to build houses, bridges, and roads, but the sparks contained in its inner sects. Therefore,


留言

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *